The Lounge Off Topic PG-13.
Warning: The Lounge may contain irrelevant and off topic discussions that may not be related to anything HHR. If you are not interested in these kinds of discussions, do not read or respond to these threads.

This is your Captain speaking....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2011, 12:40 AM
  #11  
Member
 
tracksentinel's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-05-2011
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 37
Did you see that they are saying that these flaws and cracks were easy to find when smoking was still allowed on planes?
Seems back when smoking was allowed the tobacco smoke would find and mark these tiny flaws where pressure was escaping with nicotene.
Who Knew?
tracksentinel is offline  
Old 04-07-2011, 01:36 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
IgottaWoody's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-13-2008
Location: Washington State, where it rains
Posts: 4,708
More like stress cracking. What alot of people dont know is alot of these failures are induced artificially and not from normal operating conditions. Take an airplane that went to the paint shop..multiple colors..lotsa tape and paper. The painters sometimes forget that running a razor blade across the metal surface, even slightly, leads to stress failure. As each flight goes thru press/depressurization the skin expands and contracts. Any nicks or 'scribe' lines on the surface will eventually fail and sometimes violently. Another source is scrapers used to remove sealant around panels and fairings.This stuff is tuff and is removed manually.If a metal scraper is used(which has been banned..cause for firing if caught),it can nick or score the surface which is why only plastic type scrapers are authorized for use. Think of it this way...glass acts the same way, score across a pane and tap it and it will break alone this line. Corrosion will also fatigue failures. Though in this case it was stated records show stringer clips have been replaced for cracking in this same area on this aircraft so it will be interesting to see where it goes. Boeing is quite thorough in their investigations.
IgottaWoody is offline  
Old 04-07-2011, 01:40 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
asanti's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-15-2009
Location: Waterbury CT
Posts: 2,070
Originally Posted by jeffs396
Not to save money, but WEIGHT...

737s are known for lap joint fatigue cracks. It's all in the design...

Where operators "save money" is farming out crucial repair work such as heavy overhauls of their aircraft to places like El Salvador, but that's corporate America these days
If that's the case then why not pursue either carbon fiber or even carbon kevlar (stronger than CF, but heavier)? I'm sure the costs would ramp up though, so that would leave us back @ square 1.
asanti is offline  
Old 04-07-2011, 06:29 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
jeffs396's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-12-2006
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,703
Originally Posted by IgottaWoody
More like stress cracking. What alot of people dont know is alot of these failures are induced artificially and not from normal operating conditions. Take an airplane that went to the paint shop..multiple colors..lotsa tape and paper. The painters sometimes forget that running a razor blade across the metal surface, even slightly, leads to stress failure. As each flight goes thru press/depressurization the skin expands and contracts. Any nicks or 'scribe' lines on the surface will eventually fail and sometimes violently. Another source is scrapers used to remove sealant around panels and fairings.This stuff is tuff and is removed manually.If a metal scraper is used(which has been banned..cause for firing if caught),it can nick or score the surface which is why only plastic type scrapers are authorized for use. Think of it this way...glass acts the same way, score across a pane and tap it and it will break alone this line. Corrosion will also fatigue failures. Though in this case it was stated records show stringer clips have been replaced for cracking in this same area on this aircraft so it will be interesting to see where it goes. Boeing is quite thorough in their investigations.
Yes, this kind of damage from usage of incorrect tools (which again brings us back to the outsourcing) can cause cracks, but in this case the failure was at one of the rivet rows on the joint...NOT caused by a score from a razor blade or scraper.

Originally Posted by asanti
If that's the case then why not pursue either carbon fiber or even carbon kevlar (stronger than CF, but heavier)? I'm sure the costs would ramp up though, so that would leave us back @ square 1.
When the 737 was designed, composites for PRIMARY structural elements were not in use yet (at least for commercial aircraft).
jeffs396 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ksfis43
The Lounge
32
05-27-2008 01:46 PM
HillsdaleHHR
The Lounge
10
03-28-2007 09:40 AM
captain howdy
Picture & Media
83
03-17-2006 06:54 PM



Quick Reply: This is your Captain speaking....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM.