2.2L Performance Tech 16 valve 143 hp EcoTec with 150 lb-ft of torque

2.2 VS 2.4 How much difference is there in power?

Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:02 PM
  #21  
Clevelandhhrss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-31-2008
Posts: 772
From: CLEVELAND
Originally Posted by Doc brown
Premium is recommended for the 2.4, not required. The only reason I use it is for the improved performance and slight savings with the increased mileage. I had a Cadillac that was also "premium optional". I noticed no performance or mileage difference, just that it ran rough with regular, so we comprimised and ran mid-grade.

There is no compelling reason to run premium in an engine that isn't tuned to make use of it. So I would not bother if we would have had the 2.2.
Man o man. This fuel octane debate will never die. Use 87. Ther is nothing premium about under 200hp. PLEASE DON"T TAKE OFENSE, not my intention. But seriously 87 is all anyone with out the bsr needs. Period. Buy by all means put 100 octane in if you feel like.
That is all
Old Aug 7, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #22  
Clevelandhhrss's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 03-31-2008
Posts: 772
From: CLEVELAND
Originally Posted by Doc brown
I've driven both. In day to day "on the street" driving, you will probalby not notice much difference. Where I notice it is in freeway driving, which I have to do every day. At freeway speeds, accelerating is just plain better. You do have to use premium in the 2.4 to get the most out of it. We jumped from 24.7 mpg to 26.7 by using premium, which for me is about $100 per year cheaper at the prices we're paying today. My average mileage is a mix of city and freeway, and I drive it pretty hard to. I haven't been able to get a read on "straight freeway" yet. We're taking a short trip next week and I'll check it then.

So for me, the 2.4 is the better choice. What we really wanted was the other features of the 2LT, so we ended up with the 2.4, but I'm sure we would have been happy with the 2.2.
If I drove your car and put 87 in, I'd bet you would get 9 more miles to the gallon.
Old Aug 26, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #23  
Silverfox's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: 08-26-2008
Posts: 1,488
From: Sequim Washington
2009 2.2L will be 155hp with Variable valve timming. 150 foot lbs tourqe.

Maybe that will change some peoples decision. Could be a slight increase in mileage as a bonus. Have to wait to find out.

Chevrolet info says use premium fuel for best performance on the 2.4L
2009 will all be E 85 useable as well. "Bah Humbug" on that idea.
They just have to be competative with others offering E 85 and look like they want to help save the planet. E85 is still burning the fuel.
Lets get onto the real deal.....Electric and fuel cells.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zappafan
HHR SS
13
Mar 29, 2012 08:05 AM
Hiperguy
SS Specific Service Issues/Repairs
16
Feb 28, 2011 05:55 AM
krooozn
2.2L Performance Tech
1
Jul 28, 2008 02:29 PM
barberpole
2.4L Performance Tech
11
Feb 25, 2008 10:31 PM
jbphill1
General HHR
10
Feb 17, 2006 11:56 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:58 PM.