SS Exhaust & Intake Kit is out
06-06-2008, 02:44 PM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-15-2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 134
No offense against CGS but I have never heard of them before and that is probably why they are trying to be the first one to release this first to get their name out there. I would prefer to go with a more well known company that will actually show me dyno graphs, take this as you will its just my personal opinion.
06-06-2008, 03:14 PM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: 01-22-2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 158
Exactly, I really hope no one buys this product and just waits for something better I know its a pain to wait for products (trust me I had to wait for months for something decent to come out for the LS2 on the GTO).
No offense against CGS but I have never heard of them before and that is probably why they are trying to be the first one to release this first to get their name out there. I would prefer to go with a more well known company that will actually show me dyno graphs, take this as you will its just my personal opinion.
No offense against CGS but I have never heard of them before and that is probably why they are trying to be the first one to release this first to get their name out there. I would prefer to go with a more well known company that will actually show me dyno graphs, take this as you will its just my personal opinion.
06-06-2008, 07:41 PM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-15-2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 134
I dont mean too but I have been burned before by this kind of crap and I dont want someone to get burned like I did going on unfounded claims. But I wont say this is a great product till I see dyno results before and after cause the one for the regular HHR looks like it would get heatsoaked too.
06-06-2008, 07:46 PM
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: 04-03-2008
Location: A state of L N F Performance
Posts: 1,434
I would like to see more of a CAI and at least a catback. Axelback... what's the point?
No offense at all to the company, but no one seems to have a pic on the intake installed, no one seems to have a sound clip of the exhaust. HP increase claims, but no dyno to prove it. They needed to get more things ready before they released it.
No offense at all to the company, but no one seems to have a pic on the intake installed, no one seems to have a sound clip of the exhaust. HP increase claims, but no dyno to prove it. They needed to get more things ready before they released it.
06-06-2008, 07:56 PM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: 03-15-2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 134
LMAO I know but not this company at least for a while if ever, they just wanted to throw a product out on the market fast to get all the press. Excellent marketing gimmick though so good for them.
06-06-2008, 08:18 PM
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-29-2006
Location: L.A.
Posts: 123
Cgs
I put a CGS intake on my 2.4 HHR 5sp. and though I didnt dyno it, it did run and breath better. I also had just a magnaflow muffler put on for sound! The car ran great
I now have an 08 HHR SS I too now want to see #'s from this company because our turboed engines are far more picky about what we do to them!!! No one has proven even with mods that our computer wont just adjust back and therefore all is a waste of money
I now have an 08 HHR SS I too now want to see #'s from this company because our turboed engines are far more picky about what we do to them!!! No one has proven even with mods that our computer wont just adjust back and therefore all is a waste of money
06-07-2008, 10:10 PM
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: 05-06-2008
Location: Over here
Posts: 1,076
That statement isn't universally true, and it doesn't address the many parameters that lead to "quicker power" and "less turbo lag." Just want to make sure other readers don't get off track by the "bigger is always better" message.