Burning MP3 cds for 07 LS
Member
Joined: 02-13-2007
Posts: 84
From: Ticonderoga, NY
well i guess its personal preference....
encoding bitrates dont make much of a difference, unless u have dog ears, and can tell the difference... i have 64K and 96K encoded mp3s and they sound just as good as some that i have that are FLACs or 320K mp3s...
i was talking about when the cd player READS the disc for playback, that bitrate makes no difference, since the person was saying that the disc takes a while to read and that thier files were 192K mp3s
MP3 is considered "lossy" encoding, meaing that if you try to make it back into a "lossless" file, e.g. a WAV, it looses some bits and whatnot...so the higher the bitrate doesnt make much of a difference(read above again)..if you want an EXACT copy of your cd, you can use FLAC, APE, SHN files or keep them as a WAV(too big), and those files will not lose any bits/info when encoded back into a WAV or burned to a cd
encoding bitrates dont make much of a difference, unless u have dog ears, and can tell the difference... i have 64K and 96K encoded mp3s and they sound just as good as some that i have that are FLACs or 320K mp3s...
i was talking about when the cd player READS the disc for playback, that bitrate makes no difference, since the person was saying that the disc takes a while to read and that thier files were 192K mp3s
MP3 is considered "lossy" encoding, meaing that if you try to make it back into a "lossless" file, e.g. a WAV, it looses some bits and whatnot...so the higher the bitrate doesnt make much of a difference(read above again)..if you want an EXACT copy of your cd, you can use FLAC, APE, SHN files or keep them as a WAV(too big), and those files will not lose any bits/info when encoded back into a WAV or burned to a cd
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
