Changing to larger tire sizes
For
W = section width (mm)
p = profile (%)
d = rim diameter (in.)
D = tire Diameter (.in)
(W * p / 1270) + d = D
Example:
P215/55R16
W = 215
p = 55
d = 16
(215 * 55 / 1270) + 16 = 25.31
D = 25.31 in.
(constant 1270 just comprises the % to ratio conversion, mm to inch conversion, and 2x the profile for radius to diameter conversion, 100*25.4/2=1270.)
W = section width (mm)
p = profile (%)
d = rim diameter (in.)
D = tire Diameter (.in)
(W * p / 1270) + d = D
Example:
P215/55R16
W = 215
p = 55
d = 16
(215 * 55 / 1270) + 16 = 25.31
D = 25.31 in.
(constant 1270 just comprises the % to ratio conversion, mm to inch conversion, and 2x the profile for radius to diameter conversion, 100*25.4/2=1270.)
When changing tire size, keep in mind that the manufactures typically specify a min/max rim width for each tire. I find it convenient to look that up at Tirerack.com. They usually list the specifications for all sizes of a particular design.
https://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec....n+4&isSEO=true
https://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec....n+4&isSEO=true
I always got 215X60 because they are cheaper than 55s. I did notice a tiny bit if wear on the inside of the tread from touching the strut, not enough to worry about, just a scrubbing.
This site has an interesting chart.
Metric Tire Conversion (tiresize.com)
This site has an interesting chart.
Metric Tire Conversion (tiresize.com)
I always got 215X60 because they are cheaper than 55s. I did notice a tiny bit if wear on the inside of the tread from touching the strut, not enough to worry about, just a scrubbing.
This site has an interesting chart.
Metric Tire Conversion (tiresize.com)
This site has an interesting chart.
Metric Tire Conversion (tiresize.com)
YIKES! OK just yikes. Or huh.
Maybe you’d like 205/60R16. Still bigger than stock, just not as much. Have had 2 sets, liked that the speedo accuracy actually improved. (And they were also cheaper, which is why I looked at them in the 1st place. Vendor resisted, then claimed to have gotten approval from GM, with the proviso of adding 3 psi.)
In a discussion elsewhere a guy was complaining about vibration and intermittent pulling. When asked about tires size he was sure it was fine. He posted a pic to prove clearance but it also showed a nice shallow hollow on the tread where it had been intermittently contacting the perch. A matchbook cover of clearance is not nearly enough. The tread moves around relative to the tire center.
215/55R16 25.31
205/60R16 25.69
215/60R16 26.16
The irony of improving looks by spending more money to increase unsprung weight and rotary inertia, raise the center of gravity, and go slower…
Need tires for my 2011 17” Summer setup, thinking about that size, would expect slightly slower acceleration, wondering how hard it is to correct the speedo calibration.
The irony of improving looks by spending more money to increase unsprung weight and rotary inertia, raise the center of gravity, and go slower…
The irony of improving looks by spending more money to increase unsprung weight and rotary inertia, raise the center of gravity, and go slower…
IIRC the difference was almost negligible, Was less than 2 mph faster than speed-0 .... So mine remains like that..


