Etching of paint on rocker panel and rear door rock guard
I ordered a pair but did not pick them up here is the # of the dealer 610-767-1181 Rentchlers Chevy call them & see if they still have them they are primer w/hardware let me know if they have them maybe I could send them to you or they could ship them to you
WHY? I don't think chevy owes anybody a perfect vehicle. Chevy can't and should not include everything with every car. They do not OWE anybody FREE running boards. Perhaps they should make them standard equipmet and maybe lower the cost for everyone. But they do not owe them to us. If they are included in future models the price will show it. If these were luxury cars they still would not OWE it to us. Get real. With all the info availible on the net such as this site, you should know better than to buy an HHR without running boards. Sorry but I'm out on this deal.
The farthest most people go in pre-purchase research is review sites like New Car Test Drive (nctd.com), edmunds, kbb, Yahoo, etc.-- to read road test and review articles and ratings. I have yet to see anything about the rock chip paint damage design flaw in any reviews and/or road tests on such sites.
Man, there are so many ways I could go with this... I'll just say that the buying public most certainly EXPECTS new vehicles to be as perfect as they can be made. This speaks directly to the whole import brand vs. domestic brand build quality debate.
I'm a Chevy guy and I love my HHR, but Chevy most certainly better believe they owe the consumer the most perfect vehicle they can produce, because their very survival depends on it in the face of offshore based competitors like Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, et al.
I'm a Chevy guy and I love my HHR, but Chevy most certainly better believe they owe the consumer the most perfect vehicle they can produce, because their very survival depends on it in the face of offshore based competitors like Toyota, Honda, Hyundai, et al.
Most consumers do not and should not have to go on the internet to enthusiast sites for a particular make & model and nit pick around for info on inherent design flaws for which they should then have to order optional equipment to counteract the flaw in the basic design, or to at least compensate for a design shortcoming. Which is what this issue is: a flaw or at least a shortcoming.
The farthest most people go in pre-purchase research is review sites like New Car Test Drive (nctd.com), edmunds, kbb, Yahoo, etc.-- to read road test and review articles and ratings. I have yet to see anything about the rock chip paint damage design flaw in any reviews and/or road tests on such sites.
The farthest most people go in pre-purchase research is review sites like New Car Test Drive (nctd.com), edmunds, kbb, Yahoo, etc.-- to read road test and review articles and ratings. I have yet to see anything about the rock chip paint damage design flaw in any reviews and/or road tests on such sites.
Why don't people get it?
It's NOT a design flaw! It's a 60 year old design style. So it has been having the same issues for 60 years. Back then, as now, the answers were not use the design/don't buy it, get running boards, or just deal with it.
I know I would never have thought to research the historic problems with the design before I bought the HHR. I'm also glad that I liked the look of the running boards and would have gotten them anyway.
My point is, this design have been around for a long time. If you want a retro car, expect retro problems. There's a reason the design style went out of fashion. I'm sure this was one of the reasons. Problems like this don't go away with the passage of time. We could have bought a PT. It doesn't suffer from this problem because they didn't use a similar design.
If you research pics of cars from the 30's-40's that had similar fenders styles you'll notice two things; they will mostly have running boards or a protective pad very similar to what GM did with the HHR.
It's NOT a design flaw! It's a 60 year old design style. So it has been having the same issues for 60 years. Back then, as now, the answers were not use the design/don't buy it, get running boards, or just deal with it.
I know I would never have thought to research the historic problems with the design before I bought the HHR. I'm also glad that I liked the look of the running boards and would have gotten them anyway.
My point is, this design have been around for a long time. If you want a retro car, expect retro problems. There's a reason the design style went out of fashion. I'm sure this was one of the reasons. Problems like this don't go away with the passage of time. We could have bought a PT. It doesn't suffer from this problem because they didn't use a similar design.
If you research pics of cars from the 30's-40's that had similar fenders styles you'll notice two things; they will mostly have running boards or a protective pad very similar to what GM did with the HHR.
Running boards are not the "magic, cure all" solution for the the sandblasting!! I used to think that they were but not any longer.
Dory was driven off the lot w/ running boards, and now, 23K later, the rear fenders are starting to show a bit of scarring.
The boards may slow down the effect, but it's still going to occur.
Dory was driven off the lot w/ running boards, and now, 23K later, the rear fenders are starting to show a bit of scarring.
The boards may slow down the effect, but it's still going to occur.
Running boards are not the "magic, cure all" solution for the the sandblasting!! I used to think that they were but not any longer.
Dory was driven off the lot w/ running boards, and now, 23K later, the rear fenders are starting to show a bit of scarring.
The boards may slow down the effect, but it's still going to occur.
Dory was driven off the lot w/ running boards, and now, 23K later, the rear fenders are starting to show a bit of scarring.
The boards may slow down the effect, but it's still going to occur.


